ORDER
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider Order Compelling Arbitration (Rule 59(e)).
The Court construes all pro se filings liberally.
See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007).
Having considered the motion, submissions, and applicable law, the Court finds that the motion should be denied.
Accordingly, the Court hereby:
ORDERS that Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider Order Compelling Arbitration (Rule 59(e)) is DENIED.
SIGNED at Houston, Texas, on this 27th day of April, 2026.
DAVID HITTNER
United States District Judge